<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Treehugger: Make Buildings Behave Better</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sustainableflatbush.org/2007/05/14/treehugger-make-buildings-behave-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sustainableflatbush.org/2007/05/14/treehugger-make-buildings-behave-better/</link>
	<description>Promoting sustainable living in our Brooklyn neighborhood.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:09:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: anne</title>
		<link>http://sustainableflatbush.org/2007/05/14/treehugger-make-buildings-behave-better/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 22:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainableflatbush.org/?p=42#comment-17</guid>
		<description>exactly xris. this topic is one of my passions... in fact it kind of got me started down the whole sustainability path. (see earlier post on this topic here http://sustainableflatbush.org/?p=12.) 

i really feel that energy-efficiency retrofitting of older buildings is a huge potential source of &quot;low-hanging fruit&quot; for Bloomberg&#039;s PlaNYC initiative.  the retrofits are not that costly (in the larger scheme of things), they&#039;ll reduce strain on the electrical grid and demand for more power plants, and lower emissions at the same time. the problem is that even with a relatively quick payback time, a lot of building owners and co-op/condo boards don&#039;t know about retrofit technologies and/or can&#039;t afford the initial expense.

NYC needs a serious plan to provide substantial tax credits and interest free loans to green our older buildings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>exactly xris. this topic is one of my passions&#8230; in fact it kind of got me started down the whole sustainability path. (see earlier post on this topic here <a href="http://sustainableflatbush.org/?p=12" rel="nofollow">http://sustainableflatbush.org/?p=12</a>.) </p>
<p>i really feel that energy-efficiency retrofitting of older buildings is a huge potential source of &#8220;low-hanging fruit&#8221; for Bloomberg&#8217;s PlaNYC initiative.  the retrofits are not that costly (in the larger scheme of things), they&#8217;ll reduce strain on the electrical grid and demand for more power plants, and lower emissions at the same time. the problem is that even with a relatively quick payback time, a lot of building owners and co-op/condo boards don&#8217;t know about retrofit technologies and/or can&#8217;t afford the initial expense.</p>
<p>NYC needs a serious plan to provide substantial tax credits and interest free loans to green our older buildings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xris (Flatbush Gardener)</title>
		<link>http://sustainableflatbush.org/2007/05/14/treehugger-make-buildings-behave-better/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Xris (Flatbush Gardener)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 17:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainableflatbush.org/?p=42#comment-16</guid>
		<description>And preservation and adaptation of existing buildings is more resource-efficient and sustainable than teardown and buildup. There&#039;s more than environmental sustainability at stake. There&#039;s economic, cultural, and social sustainability as well. For example, adapting old(er) buildings requires skilled workers and craftspeople familiar with the local stock, creating and developing local job opportunities in a neighborhood micro-economy.

Green building folks also have to pay more attention to - and reward - the embodied energy of existing buildings, and the energy - and waste - associated with destroying old buildings and building new ones. It&#039;s not just about annual operating costs. We need to consider the entire life-cycle of a building - from the death of the old to the death of the new - to compile a complete budget of a building&#039;s impact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And preservation and adaptation of existing buildings is more resource-efficient and sustainable than teardown and buildup. There&#8217;s more than environmental sustainability at stake. There&#8217;s economic, cultural, and social sustainability as well. For example, adapting old(er) buildings requires skilled workers and craftspeople familiar with the local stock, creating and developing local job opportunities in a neighborhood micro-economy.</p>
<p>Green building folks also have to pay more attention to &#8211; and reward &#8211; the embodied energy of existing buildings, and the energy &#8211; and waste &#8211; associated with destroying old buildings and building new ones. It&#8217;s not just about annual operating costs. We need to consider the entire life-cycle of a building &#8211; from the death of the old to the death of the new &#8211; to compile a complete budget of a building&#8217;s impact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

